New link

I’ve linked to deShan’s webpage because it’s cool and so is her artwork.  for that matter, so is she.  It’s on the right in the permanent links, but here for you lazy bastards.

contentment

Friday night, I was home in time to do two loads of laundry before midnight.

Saturday was a pretty good day.

Started out with a small gathering at the Red Cup in the morning.  In the afternoon, I joined a group of people put together by the Debster for the purpose of forming a Socrates Cafe discussion group.  I do so admire the Debster for her inspirational attitude of doing something rather than just talking about doing something.

In the evening, I had dinner with the lovely Juliet, went back to the Red Cup for an hour and then a few minutes listening to the acoustic set at GSpot followed by a few minutes with a couple of regulars at Isis.

Home again with plenty of time to spare to sit in my living room wingback chair, browse the internet with a cup of hot chocolate and a little jazz on the radio while a fire crackled and the cat perched on the back of the chair above my left shoulder.  I was again in bed before midnight.

This morning, I’m literally in bed with my laptop atop my lap and I’ve read the NY Times and the Wash. Post and looked at the new vids posted by John X and M Carp while Sinatra streaks from window to window to see the birds and squirrels.

One of the habitues of Isis was James, whose heart is weak but good and gentle.  He told me he’d spent a little time closely observing me from afar and that his main thought was that I seemed “content.”

As the poet Robert Burns observed, it’s quite a gift to see ourselves as others see us.

I think of contentment as my goal rather than my lifestyle, personal style or manner.

On the inside, it seems I’m often restless, discontent and irritable.

I may have to reconsider that attitude towards myself and my life.

After all, I have a lovely and quiet home that brings me a lot of joy.  I’m surrounded by artwork produced by the creative urges of people I know and care about.

I drive a nice car.  It’s not the jazzy two seater I had last year, but it’s a very nice vehicle.

I have a lovely wardrobe. 

Self employed, I make a living but I don’t have to show up at a particular time and I don’t answer to much of anyone about anything I do.  For example, Friday afternoon, I went to the studio of the Oz and he and I whiled away some sunshine going to get some keys duplicated and then to far south OKC to take possession and inspect a home that is in a probate estate.  Bluntly, I sorta fucked off Friday afternoon, but got paid for it.

I have a support system of friends and family that is very satisfying and fulfilling.  Mom’s frisky and feisty and that’s a big plus.  I have children and grandchildren I adore and who enhance my life simply by their very existence.  I do interesting things and meet interesting people. 

I have time to read and write and contemplate and blog and fulminate and roar through that avenue.  The diversity of my acquaintence delights me: transexuals, Europeans, gays, straights, Africans, Asians, people from the India subcontinent and S. America, rich, poor, middle class, right, left, radical, believers, non-believers, drunks and recovering drunks. Citizens of the world, all.

What more do I need to be content?  As MB says of herself: I have all I need all around me. 

This morning, as I write, the computer is churning out a playlist of soothing music:  Yo Yo Ma is playing some Brazilian pieces right this moment. 

The Sumatra coffee beans I ground this morning make a full flavored and “round” cup of java at my side and a cigaret burns in the ashtray invitingly.

Another X, privacy shattered Sharon, is getting married and I so love her and wish her the very best.  This news makes me very happy and I find the circumstance soothing, calming and I love her enough that I’m glad for her because I know how much it pleases her.  That seems extraordinary to me that I would have those feelings, and I’m happy for that.  No jealousy, no envy, no snarky bullshit.  I’m really pretty lucky on the score of X relationships.  I want them all to be happy.  I still love all the ones I once loved.  I am sincerely glad that my Xwife is remarried.  I want her to be happy and get what she wants out of life.  Barbara Jellybean remarried and it always makes me glad to see her and see her seemingly happy.  I have other Xs still out there looking and struggling for a good relationship.  I’m wistful about the loss of some of the relationships, but it would make me sad if they never reached their goals and I don’t really have any deep regrets about my lovelife.  While I’ve been grousing about my current situation, I’m really sort of, well, content to let the universe unfold as it should without me thinking that I’m taking control of the situation.

Still, the nature of my mind is such that I’m so easily diverted from this path of serenity and contentment.  Perhaps others also see me as content.  Know ye this:  I must forcefully turn my mind in that direction.  It takes an act of conscious will for me to center up and get content.  I must remind myself to get perspective (“How much will this matter in 5 years?) before I have any perspective at all and the alternative is that I’m all excited about someone else’s problems. I must take an active role in reminding myself of all my blessings in order to calm down and be secure in my surroundings.  I must sit down and tell myself the truth others intuit effortlessly:  most people are just doing the best they can at the time and almost always with the best of intentions.  It’s very likely not about me at all.

Shakespeare wrote that “there is nothing good nor bad but thinking makes it so.”  Perhaps you prefer the more modern and perky “attitude is everything”.  Whatever.  In all events, I think myself content this morning, thanks to James’ nudge in that direction.  Now, don’t fuck with me, I’m where I want to be.

Crunching the numbers

Flibbertigibbet! has a statistical question and I’m always willing to try to be helpful.

Population of Oklahoma City     640,000

Males                                     300,000

Straight                                 270,000

Age > 35 and < 65                 100,000

Unmarried                                40,000

Above Poverty                           30,000

Some College                            10,000

Males < morbidly obese              7,500

No gross mental, phys. defect     6,000

Live in NW OKC                           2,000

Already involved with the woman who will make them commitment phobic when they meet Flibbertigibbet and/or living with Mom

                                                 200

Men she's dated, dumped or divorced

                                                   50

Men looking for someone younger or with bigger tits or just clueless

                                                      1

Oddly, you will meet and fall in love with the heir of the Fahrquar Humate Co. fortune.  Who woulda guessed?

You're welcome.

 

 

Polyamory

Last night’s movie was “We Don’t Live Here Anymore”, a 2004 film starring Naoimi Watts, Laura Dern, Mark Ruffalo and another guy whose name I forgot.

Two couples, the guys both work in an English Dept. at a nondescript college, friends.  They engage in an “urban swap.”  The couples switch partners and things end rather badly, but without mayhem. 

Not a particularly fun filled laff riot like Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice from back in the late 60s.

As luck would have it, I happened to meet some polyamories last weekend.  T, a bi male, and his wife, C, who had recently taken as a lover another woman, Cprime.  They were all headed to the Nichols Hills home of a woman who was hosting a sort of sexual free for all that included 20 people or so and started at midnight.

Maybe you’re interested in this.  Maybe you’ve been to Oklahoma City’s Club Eden or dorked around on Adultfriendfinder. com.  No, I’m not linking to those sites.  If you’re interested, you’ll find them and I don’t want that internet footprint linked to this blog.

This raises all kind of questions for me.  Like, who do you send a valentine?  What does it say?

Are there polyamory valentine cards?

“To my loving wife and her girlfriend”

“To my main man and all the guys at Club Eden”

“I love you deeply, madly, … and also her … Oh, and him … her, too”

For a guy who just concluded that men are goofballs and girls have cooties, this is a little overwhelming.

In the end, I make no judgments about any of this except that it’s not for me. 

I can’t handle one person in my life and bed at this point, so the idea of more than one person treading on my trust issues and control issues and general goofballness makes my scared little boy and internalized mamma and everyone else on my committee (with the notable exception of Id, who was busy whacking off at the time and forgot to vote) go fully out of their mind at the very idea.

It’s funny to me that the thought process I went through was so mundane.  I didn’t want to go to any party at midnight, I was tired. 

I was, however, interested in hearing a little of their story.  I can’t say I understand it, but it came at me in a little bit of a disjointed way at least in part because they were drinking and going into the tank.  That was another reason not to indulge; I dislike being around drunks.

So, it’s funny to me that I didn’t have any moral repugnance and high ground on that score and it wasn’t even the fear of an STD, although sex and death (AIDS) are powerful stimulants.

I really just kind of didn’t want to get sweaty and have to get dressed again.

I wonder if things would have been different if it had been Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

One of my own personal issues with polyamory is that I don’t share well with others.  I mean, I have a reputation as being a guy who won’t even share an ashtray.  Share a lover?  Not happening.

And, I’m completely unsure how this dovetails, if it does, with my conclusion that girls have cooties and guys are goofballs.  Does a bisexual polyamory male get cooties on his goofballs?  Does a bisexual polyamory female roll her cooties into a goofball?

Very confusing.

So, here we are, bloggers.  We find it difficult in the extreme to understand each other when the topic is one guy, one girl and a standard, no frills, romantic relationship.  How may we regard the situation when what one wants is multiple partners and/or sex with persons of both genders?

Is there really such a thing as “no strings” sex?  Have these people actually found a way to have their sexual needs met without any of the messy emotions that go with that for most of the rest of us?

Someone else will have to figure it out.  I don’t have any great moral truth or insight into humanity. 

All I know is that it’s not for me.  I’m issued up and can’t take on further issues like that.  I’d have to give up one of the beloved issues I already have and I’m too attached to my passive agressiveness and trust and control issues to let them go.  Things are difficult enough for me as it is.  I’m basically afraid of sex in the first place and have to kind of screw up my courage, so to speak, just to have one person of the opposite gender in my bed for sexual purposes.  I’ve never met a guy I wanted to kiss.  I don’t want to share my partner with someone else, not even another woman, and not even if it’s a threesome.  (way too conflicting and confusing for me).

But, Angelina Jolie … well … good thing I’ll never have to face that choice.

"last" word on love

Below is an email from my sister, late of Mind Over Mary, which I reprint with permission.  However, for another good laugh and “last word”, please see my daughter’s comment to “Romance Blogging Spreads.”  I love these women and their sense of humor.
 

I absolutely LOVE your blog, MCARP and Nina’s.    The three of you have been writing some really good stuff on love and relationships.    It’s so interesting that all three of you say the same thing!    Men want love, women want love, so what’s the problem?    Why can’t anyone find it?       Why is love the hardest, most elusive thing to grasp?   
It cracks me up that we’re all so fucked up.   You men say women are impossible.  We women say you men are impossible.    Yet when we reveal the depths of our despair over not having it, we’re all the same.   You would think it would be easier to achieve.
It makes me wonder if we all love being miserable more than we love being happy.    Maybe being miserable is more comfortable.    Maybe love is too easy and therefore not as much fun.  
If we all found the loves of our lives, what would we have to bitch about?    If we had everything we want in another person, how could we stand it?    No drama, no complaints, just pure happiness.    So boring! 
It’s so much more fun yearning for something we can’t have!    Isn’t it?
I don’t know who mcarp is and I kind of, sort of remember Nina.    I can’t wait to come back to OKC this summer and hang out with them!    I’m completely in love with mcarp’s mind.    I love Capricorns!   I “get” them.
I think the key to this love mystery is that we have become a people of “all about me”.    We’re afraid to be “all about them” because of the pain we fear it will bring.    I think about Mamaw and Pop Parrish, Jim and Dot, the two couples I have known in my life who really seem to have found the answer.    They are my goal.    Both couples seem to live in their own world of each other.   The husband and wife don’t question who gives more to the other, they simply give without reservation.     I like it.   I want it.   I will have it.
I love you, Big Brother.   I hope you find what you’re looking for.
Editor’s Note:  “Mamaw and Pop Parrish” are my maternal grandparents and “Jim and Dot” are maternal uncle and his bride of almost 50 years.  Don’t miss RebL’s comment below, it’s so funny it made me fart and belch.
Blogblah

This is what I'm talkin' 'bout

NEW YORK, Feb 5 (Reuters Life!) – For most women, the choice between sex and a new wardrobe is simple — they go for the clothes.

Women on average say they would be willing to give up sex for 15 months for a closet full of new apparel, with 2 percent ready to abstain from sex for three years in exchange for new duds, according to a new survey of about 1,000 women in 10 U.S. cities.

Sixty-one percent of women polled said it would be worse to lose their favorite article of clothing than give up sex for a month.

“Some people say clothes make the man, but the right clothes can even replace him,” fashion designer, stylist and TV personality Carson Kressley from the reality TV show “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy” said in a statement accompanying the poll.

The study also suggested that clothes often wear better than relationships.

The average woman between 18 and 54 years of age has hung on to her favorite article of clothing for 12 and a half years, a year longer than she’s held on to her longest relationship.

Almost three-quarters of respondents, or 70 percent, also said they believed in love at first sight when it came to finding the perfect article of clothing, while only 54 percent of women were as confident in spotting the right man.

Nearly half of the women, or 48 percent, taking part in the survey by consumer products giant Unilever said their favorite article of clothing was more reliable than their man in giving them confidence and making them feel sexy.

Blogblah spanked

Nina, who can’t figure out how to comment on this blog, fusses at me on her blog, Flibbertigibbet! here.

Just doing rough figuring, a boob job costs about $3,500, liposuction about $2000 and a tummy tuck about another $3,000.  Prolly take about a year to have the surgeries and heal up.  So, 10K and a year and presto! Playboy bunny.

Cost of a goofball becoming intellectually honest and emotionally available?  Priceless.  That service is not available.  Not for any price and not within any reasonable time limit.  If we could flip a switch and become a “grownup”, we’d a done it a long time ago.  If hearing a woman’s voice cavill could make us grow up, we’d have left high school, or at least our first marriage, grown up.  We didn’t.  We’re goofballs.

At least when goofballs set standards, it’s possible in the real world to meet the standard.

Post Script

After writing the last post, I went to the grocery and bought some roasted chicken and on my way home, at 63rd and May, I thought “if I turn right, I can pick up some white wine to go with this chicken.”  Huh?  Where’d that come from?  Then: “Fuck wine, how about some single malt scotch.”  Shit.  That’s bad.  The first thought, OK, that happens to recovering alcoholics and we learn to just have those thoughts and let them go.  The second thought, the one about scotch, that’s an anomaly.  That’s the kind of drinking thought I only have when really depressed or really celebrating.  That’s a tougher one to explain and let go of.  Hmmmm.  Ate dinner and it was delicious and Sinatra really enjoyed the very tiny sliver of white meat I hand fed him.  Went to Starbucks for a coffee afterwards.  I couldn’t get out of Starbucks fast enough.  A gush of agoraphobia struck me when I took my place in line behind a couple of nondescript people.  Getting into my car, I was hurt, full of rage and nonspecific anxiety, a whole admixture of feelings, and mostly, and oddly, very very lonely, alienated, beyond alone.  I’ve concluded that the discussion about relationships is dredging up some ooookey feelings that I don’t want to feel.  I hate this, but it means I might actually learn something about my authentic self.  More likely, I’ll act out and really offend someone I love and care about and spend my way out of solvency and then hide in my closet until someone comes to help me.  Ya never know, though, do ya?

Valentines Day is when?

Nine days from Valentines Day and we’re fussing about relationships.  Coincidence or Irony? 

It’s amusing to me in the extreme that I write these fulminating and incendiary polemics on topics of life and death, war and peace, whatever, and not a leaf stirs in the blogosphere.  I write a few lines off the top of my head about love, though, and I get extended responses from MCARP here, Flibbertigibbet! here and Karmic Ironies here, a hurricane of bloviation on love and relationships.

A few quick notes about the responses …

Nina’s response is interesting to me in that she begins with the proposition that she will never understand men.  Welcome to the club, darlin’, we don’t understand you back.  However, I can do for you what you cannot do for me on that score:  I can say in one sentence the key to understanding men.  If you would understand men, you must completely own and understand that we grow older but not up.  Oh, you may say, I have seen maturity in men.  Balderdash!  Perhaps we’ve made a mature decision about our transportation — a minivan, for example, instead of a two seater sports car.  That is not maturity where relationships are concerned and all you have to do is ask MCARP, a minivan owner.  I have personally made a great many mature judgments as a parent and as an attorney, but I readily admit to immaturity where relationships are concerned. Sorry, Nina, we do not mature.  Whatever act we had when we first began to get hair on our scrotums, we merely polish up that act over the decades.  If we were jocks in our teens, we’re playing tennis in our 30s and golf in our 50s.  If we were writing poems in our teens to get chicks, we are now writing better poetry as a result of our English lit. degree and now we’re writing a novel when we leave our P.R. jobs at the local ad agency.  If we had a hot rod as a 17-year-old, we’re still fooling ourselves into believing that “muscle” on wheels delivers chicks to our side and perhaps we’ve bought a GoldWing just to prove it.  In point of fact, I believe that all those men broke up with you because you are a grownup AND EXPECTED HIM TO BE GROWN UP AS WELL.  It’s the most frightening prospect a man can face.  Don’t you think that there’s a good reason why men waste a year before telling you to shove off while you only wait 6 weeks or 2 months?  Don’t you think there’s a reason why we tell you some bullshit about the interior dramas we’re having while you, grownup as you are, can be simple and honest? It’s not that we think we’re entitled to a Playboy bunny, as you posit, it’s that the desire for a Playboy bunny is an expression of our juvenile and immature attitude towards relationships and women.  No matter our age, when in the company of men, we tell and laugh at jokes about excrement, flatulance and masturbation.  Farts are still funny to 50 year old men because we simply never got any more mature than when we first discovered those phenomena.  And, one last thing about the bitter joke lardass couch potatoes tell about the bunnies (other than mention it’s what they say to torture themselves about all the cultural cues they get about being less than because of their lard ass):  ask yourself how many women you know who are on some perpetual diet, getting their tits implanted and maybe even getting on a treadmill several times a week to tone up that ass.  Are men solely to blame for the Playboy bunny syndrome? 

For MCARP, a clarification:  there’s a reason “win” was in quotation marks.  I don’t see relationships as a zero sum game with winners and losers.  I do see that some people make the decision not to get into relationships and that they do so because they believe they maximize their happiness by avoiding the problems of relationships and by achieving and putting a focus on other goals.  In that sense, I believe they “win”.  On the other hand, I believe they are also merely devising another shape and form of the barricades and battlements I mentioned as having myself.  And, while it’s true that I said I think it’s a shell of a life not much better than death, I also said it’s my most likely next strategy.  Until it becomes my strategy, though, I’m with Westika:  better to love and lose than never love at all.  As much as I hate the pain of a failed romance, I also love the high of having someone with whom to share and grow and talk and get fluttery fingertips in the chest over.  From my perspective, my own thinking is so often off the beam that I NEED another person in my life with whom I’m so intimate that I can talk and bounce ideas off and get grounded in reality.  I can’t yet join you because I still hope and believe that there’s someone out there who can put up with my shit, leave me alone and be there (all at the same time, mind you) when I’m flailing about.

For me, and I don’t pretend to speak about humanity or anyone else at all, for me, part of the problem is that I am not just male, I’m human.  I’m a mammal.  I have all these conveniently placed nerve endings in my genitalia.  I have this perfectly servicable hormonal system.  I have this visual brain structure.  My very existence is formidably grounded in the fact of my physical being.  Most of the reason I’m on this planet has to do with survival of the species.  I was bred and had children because that’s what we humans do.  Fortunately or unfortunately, these instincts and physical structures, intelligently designed or evolved as they may be, had the unintended consequence of recreational sex not intended for procreation.  Whatever priority one may place on those facts, those facts cannot be ignored.  They are facts and they exist and they must be dealt with.  I will necessarily, as a fact of life, have some relationship with some women and that cannot be avoided.  I will necessarily, as a fact of life, want to have sex with at least some of them.   I can choose to have only non sexual relationships with women and to be frustrated in my desire to have sex with some woman, but for me that is choosing not to decide.  For me, that is choosing to deny my humanity.  For me, that is choosing gray over all the other vivid colors of life and love.  While I might have a perfectly lovely life in my career, while I might have a terrific set of friends (and I most assuredly do, including MCARP) that I find very comforting, while I might have creative urges towards writing that contributes much to my well being and serenity, to choose not to have any romantic relationship is the choice to cease to be human in that central sphere of human experience.  It is worse than death because in death we also have no relationships, but by making that choice, unlike the dead, we are conscious of the choice and its consequences.  One consequence of avoiding relationships might very well be that my writing is 2 dimensional when describing women, that my career choices sometimes lack balance and that my friendships are crippled by my immaturity with and about women (friends get very tired of hearing about one’s dramas, I suspect). 

Last to weigh in was Westika, our 20-something maven at Karmic Ironies. Ah, how I love you, Jazz.  First, stop with the defensiveness: not only have you already had more relationships than me, but also more complex ones.  In addition, because of that whole “boys grow older, not up” thing, you are also more mature than me.  I take your views very very seriously.

Here, for me, was the “money quote” in your blog post:

But here I am, not giving up, though I made that big decree a couple blogs ago. I love love too much. Whether it ends up sticking in a mutual-trust kind of symbiotic relationship or I end up floating around, happy in myself but willing to experience the pulls and explosions of what happens along the way, I defy the notion of regret. I defy the notion of settling. I defy the notion of making someone suffer for my shortcomings or being myself poisoned by someone else’s inability to notice moments.

Her head is bloody but unbowed, God bless the child.

For those of us who are older, even if not mature, though, we’ve faced some similar choices.  I will never be an NFL wide receiver.  I will never be an NBA point guard.  I will never be a U.S. Senator or candidate for president of the good old US of A.  I’ve made choices that foreclosed other choices.  When I choose to be with one woman, I’ve also chosen not to be with all the other women in the world.  As we age, we realize that more and more doors shut behind us.  That, and that alone, is what separates us.  You have many many more open doors ahead of you than we do.  We envy the hell out of your youth.

Even in your youth, I think you put your finger on something I tried to get at in my original post.  There is that theoretical possibility that the real me can have a real relationship with a real woman and that both of us can find happiness despite our filters of imaginary men and women that will always lie between us.  I do not think I must be perfect nor even fully mature to achieve this relationship.  I think it’s possible that the real and greatly flawed me can have a nurturing and loving and kind and understanding and sexy love relationship with someone who is also real and therefore flawed, but flawed in a way that fits my rough edges.  Here’s where the movies and fiction and poems get all entangled, I suppose, but it’s also where our hope lies.  I do know some people in long term relationships who seem to have discovered the trick to getting that done successfully.  They are rare, to be sure.  In some ways, it seems like the lottery.  Lots of people buying tickets, a rare few winners.  I give 2 bucks to Bookemdano every week for lottery tickets because I dream about having millions.  I ask women out on dates because maybe I’ll hit that one in 6.5 billion chance that she’s “The One”.  Actually, I don’t believe in soulmates.  I think my odds are better than the one woman in the 3.5 billion women in the world.  There are about 175 million women in the U.S.  I think I could maybe have a good relationship with something like 1.75 million, one percent.  Just guessing, I think I have about a 1 in 100 chance and that my filters for who I will ask out on a date makes my chance with any first date woman about one in 50.  My actual dating experience has been that at least two or three of the 50 women I’ve dated lifetime could have been a good match for a long term relationship and/or marriage.  And, in fact, I had a 30 year marriage, which isn’t bad all in all despite the fact that it ultimately failed.  I think I mostly beat the odds, Fate’s way of playing with my head, without ever hitting that ultimate powerball jackpot.

So, here we all are a few days away from the romance holiday of St. Valentine.  Many of you know that I do something unusual on Feb. 14.  I buy cheap valentines meant for grade schoolers and hand them out indiscriminately in public places on that day.  It’s fun,  surprising and revealing.  This year, however, I have no reservations for dinner and no jewelry being monogramed.   I’ll let you know, Dr. Phil, how that’s working for me when it goes down.

blogblah!!!